About Ingestible Schema Language (ISL)

Everyone wants to use AI.
Few organizations can govern it reliably.

In practice, organizations encounter the same structural problems:

AI can misinterpret intent

AI cannot be assumed to remain consistent

AI drifts over time—across prompts, users, updates, and environments

This is not a theoretical concern.
It is an operational one.

Ingestible Schema Language (ISL) exists to address that reality.

What ISL Is

Ingestible Schema Language (ISL) is a deterministic language layer that constrains AI interpretation so outputs remain consistent, auditable, and aligned with intent.

ISL does not replace AI.
ISL constrains AI.

By defining what information may be considered, how it is interpreted, and what outputs are allowed, ISL converts AI from an open-ended generator into a governed reasoning system.

The result is AI behavior that is:

repeatable

audit-ready

stable across time and teams

resistant to interpretation drift

Why ISL Exists

Modern AI systems are powerful but fragile.

Their outputs vary based on:

phrasing and context

hidden system changes

model updates

accumulated inference drift

This variability is acceptable for experimentation and conversation.
It is unacceptable in environments where misinterpretation creates risk.

ISL was designed for organizations operating in healthcare, finance, universities, and governance, where consistency, accountability, and continuity are non-negotiable.

How ISL Is Used

ISL is not downloaded.
It is deployed intentionally.

Organizations use ISL to:

standardize interpretation across people, systems, and time

reduce ambiguity in decisions and handoffs

prevent policy and logic drift

allow AI to assist decision-making without surrendering control

ISL works with existing AI systems and platforms.
It does not require replacing tools or models.

What Makes ISL Different

ISL is not a model, not a prompt, and not a wrapper.

It is a governed language layer designed to remain stable across:

personnel changes

organizational growth

model upgrades

long time horizons

For this reason, ISL is evaluated before it is licensed.

Organizations are invited to test ISL using their own AI systems through structured evaluation samples, allowing fit to be assessed before any deployment discussion occurs.

What You Receive

Organizations engaging with ISL receive:

sector-specific evaluation CISLs

tier-fit determination based on size, risk, and complexity

a controlled path toward deployment review

Evaluation samples do not include licensing rights or deployment artifacts.

The Bottom Line

AI is inevitable.
Uncontrolled AI is a liability.

ISL exists to make AI usable, governable, and trustworthy in environments where drift is not an option.

​

​

​

 

 

Our Vision

The future will run on AI.
The question is whether that future will be governed.

Our vision is a world where AI systems are not treated as opaque black boxes or creative novelties, but as accountable participants in human systems—capable of assisting decision-making without eroding trust, intent, or institutional memory.

Ingestible Schema Language (ISL) exists to make that future possible.

The Problem We Are Solving

As AI adoption accelerates, organizations face a widening gap:

AI systems are increasingly powerful

Organizational trust in AI is increasingly fragile

This gap is caused by drift, inconsistency, and loss of meaning over time.
Left unaddressed, it leads to:

unstable decisions

governance failures

regulatory exposure

erosion of accountability

Our vision is to close that gap permanently.

The ISL Vision

We envision ISL becoming a foundational language layer for institutional AI use—one that allows organizations to:

preserve intent across time and systems

maintain consistent interpretation despite change

deploy AI without surrendering control

audit reasoning instead of guessing outcomes

ISL is designed to outlive models, platforms, and trends.

Where This Matters Most

Our vision is focused on environments where failure is not abstract:

healthcare systems where consistency affects lives

financial institutions where drift creates systemic risk

universities and research institutions where knowledge must persist

governance environments where accountability is mandatory

These are not places for experimentation without structure.
They are places where AI must behave predictably.

A Long-Term Standard, Not a Short-Term Tool

We do not see ISL as a product cycle.
We see it as infrastructure.

ISL is built to:

scale across organizations

remain stable across decades

integrate with evolving AI technologies

support governance without slowing innovation

Our goal is not to control AI.
Our goal is to make AI fit for responsibility.

The End State

The end state is simple:

AI that can be trusted
because it is constrained,
auditable,
and aligned with human intent.

That is the future ISL is designed to support.